I would love to see prompt examples that created the images on the announcement page.

You can by changing the view before the gallery

I really like what Framwork has been doing, but I have an honest question: is 20 hours of Netflix 4k streaming at 250nit and 30% volume a spec to show off? I genuinely don't know.

I thought most modern laptops have dedicated video decode hardware that is fairly easy on battery. At only 250nit though...that seems dim by today's standards. I'm happy to be wrong though!

My big question around the Mythos FUD, is this: if we take for fact the Mythos is as powerful and dangerous as we’re being told (and I realize this is part marketing), and because of that Anthropic isn’t going to release it…how long can that last? Isn’t it reasonable that OpenAI or xAI or some other company - or foreign government - will come up with a similarly dangerous model fairly soon?

So what’s Anthropic’s plan here? How long can they withhold releasing Mythos or something Mythos-like? Is it reasonable to think they - or another AI provider - are going to dumb down future models so they’re less dangerous? I personally don’t think that’s the case.

I’m not saying Anthropic should or shouldn’t release Mythos, but it leaves me wonderingwhat’s going to be different in, say, 6 months or even a year when they or another provider releases a model as dangerous as we’re being told Mythos is?

I noticed this as well and came here to comment about it. The term "vibe coding" is becoming quite overloaded.

I had a very mediocre experience with their sales team when I was trying to understand how my company could sign up for their enterprise plan. I could barely get the time of day from them and once I finally got a response, the rep knew very little and never responded to my follow up questions. At that time, enterprise plans started at a $250,000 minimum spend/year, which we would've been well over.

> Its actually kind of fascinating how a huge enterprise like Youtube can ruin a feature to the point that its actually useless.

For the people in charge of engagement at YouTube, making search useless is a feature. If most people don’t get value from search then they’ll resign and be forced into following the algorithm, which is how Google wants you to consume YouTube.

Similar reason why streaming providers keep making it more difficult to find your previously watched list.

It’s truly unusable. What a mess the web has become.

"Letting the agents loop can result in more changes than expected, which are usually welcome..."

If "more changes than expected" means "out of scope", then I disagree. Those types of changes are exactly one of the things that's best to avoid whether code is being written by a person or an LLM.

It doesn’t mean that they are always out of scope, rather than the reviewer can be nitpicking (like humans do) and instead of addressing the comment in a follow-up PR, the change gets addressed in the same PR. So not necessarily out of scope, but it can add up and make it harder for a human to review.

That’s why I’m wondering if we should instruct the agents to act more like humans would: if the change can be done in a follow-up PR, this is probably what an experienced engineer would do.

The fact that this is on by default, especially for paid accounts and even more especially for organizations, where certain types of privacy is sometimes mandated by the industry your business is in, is ridiculous.

There should also be a much easier one-click to opt out without having to scroll way down on the settings page.