Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | fsckboy's commentslogin

>Valid complaints, but contrary to the HN guideline

the site not too long ago banned ai generated content. i don't know if they changed it but pointing out that something was AI would have been following/flagging the rule/violation


an article about a new app is an article about a new app, even if self promotional.

an article that spends most of its time talking about the sunshine and roses of purchasing domains from a domain squatter, even if you are a domain squatter, is an article about domain squatting.


>"we don't need to read it" [here]

many people here don't read the articles, and that's not going to change. (on today's internet, jumping from the site you want to be on to a site with unknown UX patterns is fraught)

but people here do read the comments, so having important details from the articles in comments here improves the quality of comments here, at least if you value staying on topic.


I think mostly the point is that it inadvertently implies that the message adds something new. A note that the same thing was posted on LinkedIn would help the ones tho did read the linked content know right away it's the same. I managed to just move on, but I did had a knee-jerk moment of "what if I'm missing something?" - I suppose for some people it's more difficult.

Why would somebody click a link to GitHub and then not read the text that very obviously pertains to the title of the submission they clicked on?

Also saying that GitHub has unknown UX patterns made me lol.


>fraught

dumb "journalists" especially have this backwards mindset.


the question isn't whether the user is trusting Plaid with too much access, the question is whether Plaid is trusting these apps with too much.

>LLM-assisted coding is $100/mo. It looks very commoditized when most houses in developed world pay more for electricity than that.

this is a small nit, but you still have to pay your electric bill, the $100/mo is on top of that. if you're doing cost accounting you don't want to neglect any costs. Just because you can afford to lease a car, doesn't mean you can afford to lease a 2nd car.


You mean the regular electricity bill of your house and computer use? Computation runs on the cloud so not sure what you’re trying to argue here

it's a blatant double standard if you have evidence of people "doing it and getting away with it", but you don't, you just suspect it. and it's scapegoating if blame is centered on a person or group to explain away the totality of a widespread (or made up) problem, and that is also not happening here, instead "a person did something" and got arrested.

I don’t understand the point of denying reality when it unfolds in front of you. Plenty of evidence for these things. Denial of obvious truth is an American epidemic and cultural export

The point is that none of the congressional cases would end in a conviction. So unless you want to suspend rule of law theres not really much we can do without some hard evidence.

Rule of law has been suspended in your country already. That’s an observable fact


>Rural kids are put into situations where they are expected to rely fully on themselves, with life-or-death consequences, from a young age.

come to the city, farm boy, and we'll give you a corner you can sling the brown from and we see how you do. we find something fo yo daughters to do too*

*i have absolutely no street smarts, country or city, but I do watch Law & Order and know how to pound a nail and know what to grease the maitre d' to get into the hottest restaurants in town. and beyond that i got friends, some of these guys know people who know people, just sayin


Ah yes, encouraging people into shitty situations, the hallmarks of city life.

His tone I did not like either, but his point was that city life is not without mortal dangers either, which I think is fair.

Perhaps one difference is that it seems to be considered good/normal parenting to expose your farm kids to mortal dangers, but it's definitely not considered good parenting to expose your city kids to mortal dangers (despite the city having no lack of mortal dangers).

Rural dangers are (usually) environmental/natural.

Urban dangers are other person.

A kid gets hurt hiking, "They were unlucky."

A kid on a scooter gets hit by a car, "Why weren't the parents watching?"

Rural values independence, Urban collectivism.

In the Urban situation you can emphasize with both kid and driver.


I believe in the country, one chooses the dangers and has some control. In the city, the danger is mostly out of control.

Poe's Law whoosh

DeMyer's Law, superwoosh

it did not make me wish to engage in political or ideological battle, i found it an interesting reflection of a complicated person's thought process. So, any battling is on you (you no doubt have a lot of company: "don't you dare feed us raw meat, we'll jump up and down in our cages and spill the poop buckets")

reading TFA gave me a complicated perspective on OSC, and reading this comment gave me a more complicated persepctive on OSC, so I'm glad I read both, and I'm glad the long battle scenes were left out of both.

this list of potential victims is from some of the press about this. there are a bunch of articles about this, I may update the list if it's straightforward [ok, i'm updating, filling in details from https://www.newsweek.com/white-house-investigating-wave-myst... and https://www.newsweek.com/nasa-issues-update-missing-nuclear-...]

Below is a timeline and summary of disappearances and deaths between 2025 and 2026, according to OAN [not sure if some of the update/additions are from OAN]:

----

Died: 2022 Amy Eskridge—Scientist reportedly researching anti-gravity technology.

July 30, 2023 - Michael David Hicks—Research scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory; worked on the DART Project and Deep Space 1 mission.

July 4, 2024 – Frank Maiwald: The NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory researcher died in Los Angeles at age 61, with no cause of death disclosed.

May 4/May 8, 2025 – Anthony Chavez: The former Los Alamos National Laboratory employee vanished.

June 22, 2025 – Monica Reza: Director of Materials Processing at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory working on a government‑funded rocket materials project overseen by McCasland [see next entry], this NASA scientist went missing during a hike in the Angeles National Forest, reportedly disappearing just yards from others in her group.

February 27, 2026 – William Neil McCasland: The retired Air Force general left his New Mexico home and has not been seen since. [McCasland also was privy to much UFO data]

June 26, 2025 – Melissa Casias: A Los Alamos administrative assistant disappeared from her residence; her mobile devices had been wiped.

August 28, 2025 - Steven Garcia—Government contractor at the Kansas City National Security Campus in Albuquerque.

December 12, 2025 – Jason Thomas: The Novartis researcher working on cancer treatments went missing, prompting a search that ended when his body was recovered from a lake on March 17, 2026.

December 15, 2025 – Nuno Loureiro: The head of MIT’s Plasma Science and Fusion Center was fatally attacked at his home in Brookline, Massachusetts. [wasn't that by the disgruntled former classmate of his from 25 yrs ago in Spain? doesn't mean it's not connected but]

February 16, 2026 (August 2025?) – Carl Grillmair: Caltech astrophysicist who worked on NASA’s NEOWISE and NEO Surveyor missions, he was shot on his front porch during the early morning.


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: