my big thing is honestly storage space which is terible. I have 256 GB but thats not enough with the size of some of my games. The model i got had no 512 Option back then.
In a per capita sense of course.
But it does pose an interesting question. To what degree does the quality of rail scale with absolute investments vs per capita investments.
On the face of it rail is almost entirely fixed cost.
The capital investment for tracks, trains and the operating cost for staff and energy are fixed to matter how many or few people the trains are serving.
The crux is that for a given cost the quality scales inversely with the population and covered area.
Transplant the Swiss rail expenses to Japan and it would make for a pitiful experience. Stretching over an area 9x larger and having to serve 12x more people, simply requires a lot more rolling stock, track and personell to offer a similar level of experience.
In particular when talking about rural rail service it's most apt to compare areas of similar size and population and in this local sense Switzerland is not just richer per capita but absolutely.
thanks for opening my eyes uninstalled ollama, currently trying out LM Studio will probably try the othe ones aswell. the .cpp always scared me from using llama.cpp directly.
reply