Why so? It seems both things are true.

I believe the odd part is "young female" phrasing. And I agree, it is odd.

And naturally an article about a misplaced house pet summons commentary on transgender rights.

I prefer his comment to yours, does that mean new accounts should be weighted higher for me and lower for you?

For maybe people, even one would be too many.

They probably make interest off it themselves, so to give you any interest would cut into their margins.

In my experience Rust and Go are both opinionated languages with strong types which makes them work well with agentic coding.

That is indeed a very annoying part of many AI models. I wish I could turn it off.

Already is in Nevada.

While I'm certainly no supporter of casinos, I think that online gambling is a difference in kind.

Given the extent to which the copyright system has benefited corporations and publishing companies to the detriment of individual authors and the general public, I'm constantly surprised that it still has many apologists.

As we don't live in a world where the rich patronize the arts some sort of copyright system is the only way authors and artists are gonna make a living doing their thing. ...though I suppose proponents of Universal Basic Income (UBI) would disagree, but between the abolishment of copyright, the institution of UBI, or a 7 year old child being hit by 7 lightning strikes and 7 meteor impacts and surviving; the latter seems the most likely.

People imagine poor author having their thing stolen rather than poor author that corporate takes IP from by contract agreement (and if you don't do that, you don't get the job), then abuses for 70+ years

What do you suggest instead? I.e. what would benefit individual authors more?

I usually relegate the agent to code, I do the git part/put the patch together. Git is an excellent tool to review the changes granularly and find potential weaknesses.