The burden of proof is the reverse, in any field of knowledge it's on the person making the claim. I could make up anything in the world (and many people do); it's the requirement for support that separates truth from fiction, science from fraud, fact from misinformation. You can't publish a scientific paper without evidence, and say 'it's true until someone proves otherwise'; it's false until you prove it. Same in a courtroom or anywhere else.
Until there is sufficient evidence that the summary is accurate, there's no reason to believe that it is.
fwiw, all caps is against HN guidelines. I'm mentioning it because there seems to be a rash of it this week.
