I was setting up a new PC yesterday. I did the "use edge to install Firefox" thing and my experience with the internet without ad blocking was traumatising.

But anyway it was nice to see that FF had added startengine to the choices for search engine.

It's quite shocking, isn't it?

Only my iPad gives me the unfiltered web, to discourage me from using it as a browsing device. It's very effective.

Orion Browser gives you the original uBO on iOS plus some other web extensions, depending on what APIs they use.

Safari on iOS does support adblockers, in case you didn’t know. And I’m not taking about DNS level blocking, I really mean browser extensions. I’m using AdGuard, but there are other popular options too.

That's what I use on my iPhone, but my iPad is meant to be an offline, low-distraction device.

Next time you can just do

    winget install 9nzvdkpmr9rd

which installs Firefox from the Microsoft store. Or `Mozilla.Firefox` to install from winget-pkgs if the ID is too hard to remember, but the msstore install is cleaner IME.

You could also use the Microsoft Store directly which is still better than wading through Edge.

Well, it certainly makes it easier for them to sidestep political questions about why they stopped including Yandex as a search option.

"Firefox now allows" more than a side step or a two step it's going to be a whole dance where they remember that, oh ya hey!, look, users!.

Exactly where did all, ALL, the horking huge piles of money go?, which in the current political environment could be a question that not only get's asked, but answered

Uhm what am I not getting? This has always been possible.

Edit: I think what's new is the UI to add the new engine by typing the URL by hand. Previously engines needed to support OpenSearch to auto-add them (but you could easily add custom ones this way). However pretty much all of them do (it's no trouble, just some XHTML in the page). I don't know why you would do it by hand.

> This has always been possible.

No. Starting 2-3 years you had to go through about:config to do this, such as detailed at

https://www.reddit.com/r/FirefoxCSS/comments/qqkw5x/enabling...

and

https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/custom-search-eng...

etc.

Heaven knows what they were thinking when they made this option only available by the user adding an undocumented preference!

I needed to do this on desktop linux a few months ago to use the AI-avoiding &udm=14 google tweak[0]

0: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43002403

You probably want &udm=14 and &tbs=li:1 instead of udm alone.

I see tbs=li:1 activates "verbatim". Duly applied, with thanks :)

o7

Well yes but the point was kinda moot because it was easily possible to add an opensearch provider and every self-respecting search engine supports that. Why wouldn't they? It makes it easy for users to adopt them and it's not hard, just some boilerplate code.

So the URL entry box wasn't really needed for the main purpose. It's nice to use the feature to use with things that aren't literally search engines though. Or to tweak the URL. I wonder, is the AI avoidance thing very effective? Not that I use Google directly but still.. (I use SearXNG as meta search)

> is the AI avoidance thing very effective?

Yes, it's just a way of going directly to google's "web" search instead of "all" so you don't get the AI summary and half a screen of assorted guff before the search results themselves. In that sense it's 100% effective.

Ahhh I see. I thought it was somehow trying to filter out AI generated sites in the web results. Which wouldn't be airtight of course. Now I understand, thanks!

> filter out AI generated sites in the web results

If only!

Ah I see yes, thank you! Must be a regression fix then indeed.

Edit: No, after reading it more deeply it seems to be some new UI to manually type the search URL instead of using OpenSearch for it.

Not Windows-specific, I had to go through about:config to enable this on MacOS as of late last year.

Is (was) it possible to set an OpenSearch engine as the default search provider, though? At least I haven't been able to find a way to do that, so maybe that's what's different now.

it was behind an about:config flag, which is why there are sily addons to add/customize search engines

Edit: Actually, I don't have browser.urlbar.update2.engineAliasRefresh configured at all (neither true nor false, just not configured).

But for me I've always been able to do it. All I had to do was to simply visit my SearXNG instance once, then it would pick it up (OpenSearch API) and then I could just set it as default.

In fact I remember setting up my new tablet a few months ago, and I didn't need to mess with about:config at all, it worked like I mentioned above. On firefox mobile they make it super hard editing about:config for some reason so I'm sure I didn't do that.

Yes, it has alway been working like that, but you couldn't add a search engine that doesn't have an opensearch.xml published (eg chatgpt), make custom search egines such as only search github in your org, or mix and match them such as perplexity with google suggestions

All you need is a bookmark, no extension needed: the "keyword" value is how it's called and "%s" in the url is the placeholder for the query.

For example, create a bookmark with keyword "youtube" and url "https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%s".

Then whenever you type "youtube something" in the address bar, it shows you the results directly.

The %s trick existed for so long, it even worked back in Internet Explorer.

That must be what the extension I use has been doing, but what a bizarre way to hide such a useful feature.

Yes and you can even set it as default as I have done. So you don't need to type the 'youtube' or whatever. It works exactly like a builtin one.

How can you set it as default?

You just select it under settings. Every search engine you have visited that supports opensearch automatically shows up in the list.

Interesting, for me they don't. I can only choose between Google, DuckDuckGo, and Wikipedia, even though I have more custom search engines available. They work via their configured shortcuts, but they don't appear in the search settings.

Huh no? I've just added it in settings. No custom extension needed. I'm pretty extension-averse because I already need so many :) Ublock, Sponsorblock, Dark Reader, password manager, consent-o-matic, sideberry I really can't do without.

But I've always been able to do it. All I had to do was to simply visit my SearXNG instance once, then it would pick it up and put it in the list of search engines (OpenSearch API) and then I could just set it as default.

One thing I could not do was edit search engines (e.g. the URL they visit). I still can't do that in fact but maybe that's new?

If you check the bugzilla thread in the OP, this is specifically about adding manual search engines outside of automatic OpenSearch support.

Theres a panel where you fill out the name, search URL, suggestion URL, and search keyword yourself, under settings. You can add whatever you like, even if its not OpenSearch compatible, just like you already could on Chrome (for the better part of a decade, mind you)

If a dev is lazy and doesnt incorporate OpenSearch functionality you can homebrew it easily this way.

I personally use it quite often to restrict searches for engines that otherwise only support OpenSearch for their entire catalog.

For example, I have seperate `@ma` for manga and `@an` for anime via MAL, where by default (IIRC) they only have the combined "search everything" advertised through OpenSearch.

I also use it to search individual boards on foolfuuka archive sites, as the default OpenSearch advertisement suffers the same issue as MAL where it's only for searching every board on the site at once.

I'm sure I have even more examples on my browser, I actually use it all the time so I'm glad this is getting mainlined rather than nixed. I use Librewolf, so they already had this enabled by tweaking the corresponding about:config setting themselves.

Yeah to be honest I read the bugzilla thread but I didn't find it very clear. It's really meant for the in-crowd. Which makes sense for a bugtracker but not for a HN article.

And yes good point. I can also imagine using it for stuff that's not strictly a search engine as such.