Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

We can define a Dyson Sphere in math.

We cannot build one.

AI outputting axiomatically valid syntax isn't going to be all that useful. It's possible to generate all axiomatically correct math with a for loop until the machine OOMs

Physics is not math and math is not physics.

 help



You just failed the Turing test.

reply


The Turing test just failed you. I'll go one better, physics isn't reality, it's a model of reality utilizing math.

reply


And I'll go one better, you haven't said anything here at all, you've just left a representation of what you understand to be saying.

reply


we only perceive the past.

reply


Maybe he passed the Turing test with 88.2% which is 1.8% higher than the competition.

reply


Fortunately for me equivalents to Turing exist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_machine_equivalents

reply


I don't follow. Can you explain how your comment is relevant to mine? It might help if you also explain how you interpreted my comment.

reply




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: